Scripture & Church Authority
Sola Scriptura
Questions about the Bible as the sole rule of faith, living prophets, apostolic authority, canon formation, and tradition.
Scripture and authority workshop
1. Does 2 Timothy teach Bible alone?
The objection
Paul says Scripture makes the servant of God fully equipped. If Scripture already equips us for every good work, why would Christians need another binding authority?
Read the sources
- 2 Timothy 3:14–17
Paul says inspired Scripture equips disciples for good works. Timothy already knew sacred writings as a child.
- 2 Thessalonians 2:15
Paul asks believers to hold to apostolic teaching whether they received it orally or by letter.
- Westminster Confession, chapter 1
The Reformed confession gives Scripture final authority and allows other subordinate judgments. It rules out adding new revelation to the whole counsel of God.
A reply you could give
I trust Scripture as the word of God. Paul says Scripture equips believers and also tells them to hold to what apostles taught by word of mouth. What establishes that the written record alone became binding after the apostles?
2. Does Paul’s oral teaching still bind Christians?
The objection
Paul told the Thessalonians to hold to what they heard and what they read. If both ways delivered the same gospel, doesn’t Scripture preserve all the authority Christians need today?
Read the sources
- 2 Thessalonians 2:1–17
Paul addresses alarm about the day of the Lord (vv. 1–12), then tells the Thessalonians to keep what they received by word or letter (vv. 13–15). Both ways of teaching carried authority for his hearers.
- 2 Thessalonians 3:6–12, 17
Paul calls the instruction and example of working to support oneself a tradition. In verse 17 he gives his handwritten greeting as a sign that the letter is genuine.
- 1 Corinthians 15:1–8
Paul writes down the message of Christ’s death, resurrection, and appearances that the Corinthians had already received. This gives a concrete example of earlier teaching preserved in a letter.
- 2 Timothy 2:1–2
Paul tells Timothy to entrust what he heard to faithful people who can teach others. It describes how heard teaching could be passed on and leaves later institutional claims open.
- Orthodox Presbyterian Church, “Roman Catholicism and Sacred Tradition”
The OPC reads the tradition as the gospel Paul preached and says Paul’s apostolic word binds Christians today through the apostles’ writings. This is the Protestant inference about the post-apostolic norm, not a statement made explicitly in 2 Thessalonians 2:15.
- WELS, “Scripture Alone”
WELS understands the tradition as Paul’s gospel teaching to the Thessalonians. It appeals separately to Ephesians 2:20 for Scripture alone.
- Ligonier, “Standing on the Apostolic Tradition”
Ligonier points to verse 5, where Paul says he told the Thessalonians these things in person. The article takes that overlap as support for its claim that the apostolic teaching the Church needs is preserved in Scripture.
- Westminster Confession, chapter 1
Sections 1.1 and 1.6 state the Reformed conclusion about former modes ceasing and Scripture containing everything necessary for faith and life, either explicitly or by necessary inference.
- Vatican II, Dei Verbum §§7–10
The council teaches that Scripture and Sacred Tradition form one deposit of God’s word. It says the Church’s teaching office serves and authentically interprets that deposit.
- Doctrine and Covenants 68:1–5
The revelation calls ordained servants to preach and describes their words as scripture when they speak as moved upon by the Holy Ghost.
- D. Todd Christofferson, “The Doctrine of Christ”
Christofferson distinguishes established Church doctrine from an individual leader’s personal judgment. He discusses how the First Presidency and Twelve establish doctrine under the Lord’s direction.
- Articles of Faith 1:9
Latter-day Saints affirm that God has revealed, does reveal, and will yet reveal important things. This is an explicit LDS premise for continuing revelation, whose authority and application require their own examination.
A reply you could give
Paul tells the Thessalonians to keep what the apostles taught in person and by letter. Reformed Christians argue that Scripture preserves everything the Church needs as its final rule. Catholics affirm Scripture and Sacred Tradition as one deposit. Latter-day Saints believe Christ restored apostolic authority and continues to reveal His will. Paul’s instruction gives us a reason to take genuine spoken revelation seriously. Each claim about authority today needs its own evidence.
3. Do the Bereans teach Scripture alone?
The objection
The Bereans tested even Paul against Scripture. Why would Christians need to hear a living prophet or pray about a new claim?
Read the sources
- Acts 17:1–3, 10–12
Paul argues from Scripture that the Messiah must suffer and rise. The Bereans eagerly receive the message about Jesus and examine Israel’s Scriptures to test it.
- Acts 13:26–37
In another synagogue sermon, Paul reports resurrection witnesses and connects the event to scriptural promises.
- Westminster Confession, chapter 1
Sections 1, 6, and 10 describe Scripture as sufficient and final in the Church after the former ways of revelation ceased. Acts 17 depicts the earlier situation, with a living apostle.
- Robert B. Stewart on the Bereans
Stewart invokes the Bereans to argue that a living prophet’s claimed authority does not exempt a message from testing by prior Scripture.
- Summit Ministries on testing religious claims
The article contrasts the Bereans’ use of Scripture with relying on an impression as evidence for the Book of Mormon.
- 1 Thessalonians 5:17–22
Paul directs Christians to pray, take prophecy seriously, test what they receive, and hold fast to the good.
- Moroni 10:3–5
Moroni asks readers to read, remember God’s mercy, ponder, and ask with real intent. He promises a manifestation by the Holy Ghost.
A reply you could give
I agree with the Bereans’ approach. They listened to Paul’s message about Jesus and tested it against Scripture. Acts 17 leaves open what authority God provided after the apostles. I would compare a specific Restoration teaching with the relevant biblical passages, weigh the historical evidence, and ask God for guidance.
4. What does “do not go beyond what is written” mean?
The objection
Paul tells the Corinthians to stay within what is written. Doesn’t that make Scripture alone the final rule?
Read the sources
- 1 Corinthians 4:6–7
Paul applies the warning to himself and Apollos and tells the Corinthians to stop boasting for one leader against another.
- 1 Corinthians 3:18–23
Paul quotes Scripture against worldly wisdom and draws the conclusion that the Corinthians should stop boasting in men.
- 2 Thessalonians 2:15
Paul tells believers to hold to teaching they received from the apostles orally or in writing.
- Westminster Confession 1.6 and 1.10
The confession says the whole counsel of God is found in or deduced from Scripture and gives the Holy Spirit speaking in Scripture the final judgment.
- Got Questions on 1 Corinthians 4:6
This defense reads Paul’s warning as a reason to treat the Bible as the final authority for believers today.
A reply you could give
I agree that Scripture checks human claims. Paul gives this instruction to stop the Corinthians from boasting about their leaders. He also tells the Thessalonians to keep what the apostles taught orally. What shows that the Church could receive binding apostolic teaching only in writing after the apostles?
5. Did Jesus condemn all tradition in Mark 7?
The objection
Jesus says the tradition of the elders nullified God’s word. Why would Christians receive any binding teaching outside the Bible?
Read the sources
- Mark 7:1–13
Jesus responds to a dispute over ritual washing and gives an example in which a dedication is used to avoid helping one’s parents.
- Matthew 15:3–6
The parallel account directly contrasts a human tradition with God’s command to honor parents.
- Colossians 2:8
Paul warns about teachings that follow human tradition instead of Christ.
- 2 Thessalonians 2:15
Paul tells this congregation to hold what the apostles taught orally or in writing.
- Ligonier, Scripture Alone
This Reformed reading takes Jesus’s rejection of the Corban rule as support for Scripture as the final authority.
- Westminster Confession 1.6 and 1.10
Westminster locates the whole counsel of God necessary for faith and life in Scripture and makes Scripture the final judge of controversies.
- Doctrine and Covenants 121:41–42
Priesthood influence is to be exercised through persuasion, gentleness, and sincere love.
- Upward Thought, The Leaven of the Pharisees
The chapter applies the Corban analogy to Latter-day Saints and argues that the leaders’ positions have relied on tradition since Joseph Smith.
- Official Declaration 2
The First Presidency publicly described the 1978 change in priesthood and temple eligibility as revelation. The declaration records that claim.
A reply you could give
I agree that Jesus puts God’s command above Corban. Paul also asks his readers to preserve the teaching they received from the apostles in person. If you think an LDS teaching is like Corban, which teaching do you mean and which commandment does it override?
6. Did Revelation 22 close the canon?
The objection
Revelation ends the Bible with a warning against adding to this book. Doesn’t accepting the Book of Mormon violate that warning?
Read the sources
- Revelation 22:18–19
The warning identifies the words of the prophecy of this book. The plagues and blessings named in the warning come from Revelation.
- Deuteronomy 4:2
Moses gives a similar warning about altering the words he commands. Christians still accept later biblical books.
A reply you could give
I take John’s warning seriously. It guards the words of Revelation. Deuteronomy gives a similar warning and Christians still accept later scripture. What in John’s wording extends that warning to every future revelation from God?
7. Did a church remove Paul’s earlier letter?
The objection
Paul mentions a letter we no longer have. Doesn’t that prove part of the Bible was taken out?
Read the sources
- 1 Corinthians 5:9–11
Paul apparently refers to earlier correspondence and clarifies it. He gives no account of what later happened to the letter.
- Colossians 4:16
The readers are to obtain a letter from Laodicea. Its identity and authorship are left open.
- Eusebius, Church History 3.25
Eusebius distinguishes commonly accepted books from disputed works and reports different views about Revelation.
- Athanasius, Festal Letter 39, §§5–7
Athanasius lists the 27 New Testament books and separately recommends some works for instruction.
- First Council of Nicaea, creed and canons
The surviving documents include a creed and rules about church discipline. They give no list of biblical books.
- Doctrine and Covenants 91
Joseph’s revelation acknowledges true material and human additions in the Apocrypha. It says that readers can benefit and that a further translation is unnecessary.
- 1 Nephi 13:26–29, 39–41
Nephi sees plain and precious things taken away. Later records restore understanding and establish the truth of the earlier ones. The passage does not identify individual missing books.
- Robert Bowman on the “lost books”
Bowman distinguishes writings mentioned in the Bible from works once received as scripture and then removed.
- Westminster Confession 1.2–6
Westminster lists its canon and claims sufficiency for faith and life. It allows the testimony of the Church a role in commending Scripture.
A reply you could give
Paul appears to refer to an earlier letter. That is evidence of correspondence outside the collection we have. Whether Christians received it as scripture is a different question. I believe God can give scripture again because I believe in the Restoration, and I would make that case on its own evidence.
8. Do Jude 3 and Galatians 1:8 rule out the Restoration?
The objection
Jude says the faith was delivered once. Paul says to reject even an angel who preaches a different gospel. How could the Book of Mormon fit?
Read the sources
- Jude 3–4
Jude urges believers to defend the faith once delivered. Verse 4 identifies intruding teachers who distort grace and deny the Lord. Jude does not specify the contents or closing date of a biblical canon.
- Galatians 1:6–12
Paul condemns preaching a different gospel even if the messenger is an apostle or angel. He says he received the gospel through revelation from Jesus Christ.
- Galatians 2:16–21
Paul says works of the law do not justify. If the law supplied righteousness, Christ would have died in vain.
- Galatians 5:2–6
Paul warns that seeking justification through the law, in the dispute over Gentile circumcision, would cut believers off from Christ and grace.
- 1 Corinthians 15:1–8
Paul’s summary of the gospel centers on Christ dying for sins, being buried, rising, and appearing to witnesses.
- 3 Nephi 27:13–21
The Book of Mormon presents Christ’s death and power to draw and judge humanity as central to his gospel, and calls people to repent, be baptized, and endure.
- Dieter F. Uchtdorf, “The Gift of Grace”
Uchtdorf reads 2 Nephi 25:23 as teaching salvation by grace. He rejects earning grace by obedience or waiting until every effort is exhausted before receiving it.
- David Urrea’s argument from Jude and Galatians
Urrea cites both verses in a Spanish-language critique and treats additional Latter-day Saint scripture as a later gospel that the New Testament forbids.
A reply you could give
I agree with Jude that we should defend the faith the apostles handed down, and with Paul that even an angel could not change Christ’s gospel. A later witness can be tested by what it teaches. Which Book of Mormon teaching do you think contradicts Paul, and how?
9. Did Christ bring prophecy to an end?
The objection
Hebrews contrasts the prophets with God speaking through his Son. Christ is God’s final Word, so why would his church need later prophets?
Read the sources
- Hebrews 1:1–4
God has spoken through his Son, whom the author describes as above the angels and as the one through whom God made the worlds.
- Acts 11:27–28
After Jesus’s ascension, Luke calls Agabus a prophet and says he foretold a famine through the Spirit.
- Catholic Catechism, paragraphs 65–67
The catechism teaches that Christ is the fullness of revelation and that no new public revelation is expected before his return. It distinguishes private revelations from that public revelation.
- Article of Faith 9
Latter-day Saints affirm past and present revelation and expect God to reveal more about his kingdom.
A reply you could give
Christ is the center of God’s revelation. Hebrews teaches his supremacy, and Acts shows that he can still speak through prophets. What sets an end date for that gift after the apostles?
10. Does Matthew 16 rule out an apostasy?
The objection
Jesus promised that the gates of hell would never prevail against his church. If the Church lost its authority, wouldn’t that break his promise?
Read the sources
- Matthew 16:16–21
Jesus promises that the gates of hell will not prevail against his church and gives Peter the keys of the kingdom. The passage then turns to Jesus’s death and resurrection.
- Vatican II, Lumen Gentium, section 20
The council teaches that bishops succeed the apostles by divine institution and carry on their pastoral office.
- Church teaching pamphlet, The Great Apostasy
The Church teaches that priesthood authority and the keys needed to direct the Church were lost after the apostles died, while faithful people and much truth remained.
A reply you could give
I believe Christ’s church will prevail. Our disagreement is about how he keeps that promise. Catholics point to succession through bishops. Latter-day Saints believe he restored the keys given to the apostles. What shows those keys passed on without interruption?
Completed responses
9 claims
Open the claim as it is normally framed, use the short answer when time is tight, and move into the full case when the conversation deserves it.
Does the Bible teach Scripture alone?
Paul teaches that inspired scripture equips believers for good works. He also tells Christians to hold to apostolic teaching received in writing and by word of mouth. To establish that Scripture alone became the final rule after the apostles died, you need an argument for that change. Latter-day Saints trust the Bible and believe Christ restored living prophetic authority.
Does Revelation 22 rule out new scripture?
The warning in Revelation 22 concerns adding to that prophecy; it never says God has finished revealing scripture. The Bible contains no inspired table of contents and no verse announcing that future revelation has ended.
Are books missing from the Bible?
Paul appears to refer to an earlier letter that no longer survives on its own. That tells us about missing correspondence. Early canon lists show which preserved books Christians accepted or disputed. Proving a specific book was removed requires evidence that it was first received as scripture and later excluded.
Did Jesus condemn all tradition in Mark 7?
Jesus condemns using Corban to evade God’s command to honor parents. Paul asks Christians to keep apostolic teaching delivered in person or in writing. To apply Jesus’s warning to an LDS claim, identify the teaching and the commandment it would override.
Do the Bereans in Acts 17 teach sola scriptura?
The Bereans listened to Paul’s message about Jesus and tested it against Israel’s Scriptures. That is a model Latter-day Saints can follow. Acts 17 leaves open what authority God provided after the apostles. Comparing teachings with Scripture and asking God for guidance can go together.
Does 1 Corinthians 4:6 teach Scripture alone?
Paul tells the Corinthians to stay within what is written so they will stop boasting about rival teachers. Scripture has authority in that dispute. The verse leaves open what happened to apostolic authority and spoken teaching after the apostles.
Does 2 Thessalonians 2:15 make oral apostolic teaching binding?
Yes. Paul tells the Thessalonians to hold to apostolic teaching they received by spoken word and by letter. Some of that teaching was later preserved in writing. The verse leaves open whether all of it was written down and what authority would govern after the apostles. Latter-day Saints believe Christ restored apostolic authority and can still speak through His servants.
Does Jude 3 close the canon?
Jude 3 tells Christians to defend the faith entrusted to them once for all. Verse 4 describes people distorting grace and denying Jesus Christ. Jude gives a standard for testing later claims. To conclude that all public revelation ended, a reader needs a further argument about what Christ authorized after the apostles.
Does denominational disagreement disprove sola scriptura?
Disagreement is compatible with Scripture as the final rule. Westminster and the 1689 Baptist confession give different rules for infant baptism, so the practical question is who can settle such a dispute. Acts 15 shows apostles and elders acting with the Holy Ghost. Latter-day Saints believe Christ restored living apostolic authority. The Restoration claim calls for evidence of its own.